DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS RESOURCES
-
NSF/ANSI/CAN 60 and NSF/ANSI/CAN 61 are the mainstay health effects standards that many industry experts know and trust to provide certification of drinking water treatment chemicals and contact materials. However, did you know that the drinking water acceptance criteria for chemical safety included in these standards are supported by an equally dynamic standard, NSF/ANSI/CAN 600, and an independent advisory group known as the Health Advisory Board (HAB)?
-
Discover what technologies were able to measure, monitor, and control for a city in northwest Greece, while also ensuring a safe and clean water supply.
-
Denver Water team spent a year studying the best pH probes to protect customers from lead.
-
An increased emphasis on mitigating the detrimental impacts of water pollution will foster new growth opportunities for the water testing and analysis market over the coming years.
-
Rising Pollution Levels To Offer New Growth Opportunities To The Activated Carbon Fiber Market Share
Rapid industrialization pushed by record population growth and urban migration, in tandem with several other factors such as excessive use of nitrogen-based fertilizers and pesticides, forest fires, residues in agriculture, and improper waste management, has deeply intensified pollution and environmental health risks.
-
When a water quality test came back positive for E. coli, Liberty Lake Sewer and Water District immediately implemented a series of daily flushing and chlorinating efforts with a boil water advisory in effect for 7 days that had people on edge for the upcoming Thanksgiving festivities.
-
New home for water quality lab opens new horizons for innovation, research and teaching.
-
In this article, explore the top reasons you should consider a laboratory zeta potential system for coagulation dose control.
-
The current slope of the U.S. PFAS analytical instrumentation market advancement is steep due to U.S. EPA plans to propose water and wastewater regulations for PFAS. Additionally, some of the key drivers include an increased awareness about the widespread prevalence of PFAS contamination, public outrage, funding, and litigation scares.