News Feature | February 9, 2017

Water Transfers Rule Revived In New York City Case

Dominique 'Peak' Johnson

By Peak Johnson

This month, a U.S. appeals court in New York brought back a U.S. EPA rule that allows government agencies to transfer water between various bodies, such as rivers and lakes, without needing to worry about the cause of pollution.

Reuters reported that “a 2-1 panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said the EPA acted reasonably in 2008 in adopting its ‘Water Transfers’ rule, over the objections of environmental groups.”

The decision will help New York provide its 8.5 million residents with "a reliable supply of clean and safe drinking water," Hilary Meltzer, deputy chief of the New York City Law Department's environmental law division, told Reuters.

The center focus of the case was “whether the EPA, citing Congressional intent, properly exempted the city from needing a Clean Water Act permit to draw water from the upstate Schoharie Reservoir, through an 18-mile tunnel discharging sediment-laden water into the Esopus Creek popular with trout fishers, and later to city faucets.”

Writing for the majority, Circuit Judge Robert Sack said that the” federal courts should not second-guess the EPA view that the rule properly balanced the need to improve water quality with the potentially high cost of permits.”

"While we might prefer an interpretation more consistent with what appear to us to be the most prominent goals of the Clean Water Act," Sack wrote, "so long as the agency's statutory interpretation is reasonable, what we might prefer is irrelevant."

Circuit Judge Denny Chin dissented. He called the EPA's position "unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious," and said Congress "did not intend to give a pass to interbasin transfers of dirty water."

The 85-page decision had reversed a March 2014 ruling by U.S. District Judge Kenneth Karas in White Plains, New York.

New York and eight other states, the Canadian province of Manitoba, and groups including the National Wildlife Federation and Waterkeeper Alliance opposed the EPA rule.

California and 11 other Midwestern and Western states joined New York City in supporting the rule. Also supporting it was the South Florida Water Management District, which oversees an area where polluted water has been pumped from canals into Lake Okeechobee.